RS> BK>>   I do believe accusing a poster of criminal activity is
RS> BK>>   against the rules.G

RS> JM> So it is. Guess I should have said people like ORS, who, IMO are
RS> JM> nothing more than welfare cheats.


RS> JM>   I expect the moderator will rule on that.

RS> JM> 'spect he will.

RS>Until he does, how about you fill us in.

RS>Precisely *HOW* did I cheat?

RS>Couple years ago I pointed out how Iowa corn farmers (who are hardly
RS>hurting in the least,) get more money in a month, than I would get in
RS>25 years, in direct cash payouts under farm subsidies.

RS>Not one of you have even expressed disapproval of the corn subsidies.

RS>But you are oh-so-condemning of me.

RS>You know why?

While I may not be wild about farm subsides, the farmers actually 
produce something and are good for the country.  Shall I contrast that 
with you ?


RS>1. Your gurus tell you to go after "welfare queens." (Which exist
RS>only in the demented minds of those rablle-rousing gurus like Rush,
RS>Beck, Boortz, etc) but rich corporate farmers are sacred.

The three of them help pay the large tax burden in this country,  You 
should thank them.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Barak Obama thinks we can spend our way to prosperity .....

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10