howldog wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2005 09:00:13 -0800, "bluesmama"

> wrote:
>
> >
> >howldog wrote:
> >> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:09:37 -0600, USA  wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 14 Feb 2005 17:22:37 -0800, "bluesmama"

> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>howldog wrote:
> >> >>> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:11:49 GMT, "MCP"
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > wrote in message
> >> >>>
>news:1108360239.207082.126120{at}f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> >>> >> A woman is more like a life support for
the human race!
> >Without us
> >> >>you
> >> >>> >> wouldn't be here, any of you! Thanks for being so
generous!!!
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >And without your"father" neither
would you asshole!!
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> it's incredible, the number of feminists who
constantly fail
to
> >> >>> realize that a father is as important to birth
as a mother.
> >> >>
> >> >>Well, a father isn't as important to birth as a mother is,
though
> >they
> >> >>are as important as far as conception goes.
> >> >
> >> >1.  Without a father there is no sperm.
> >> >
> >> >2.  Without sperm there is no pregnancy.
> >> >
> >> >3.  Without pregnancy there is NO BIRTH.
> >> >
> >> >4.  No Father = No Birth.
> >> >
> >> >5.  Therefore Father is *as important* as Mother.
> >> >
> >> >>My husband wasn't present
> >> >>for the births of either of our children,
> >> >
> >> >Your husband *was* present at the conception of your children.
And
> >if
> >> >he hadn't been there you would not be the mother of those
particular
> >> >children, if any children. Much as you like to pat yourself on
the
> >> >back, your going through labor and giving birth was totally
> >dependent
> >> >on a man.
> >> >
> >> >>for various reasons, though
> >> >>he dearly would have loved to be, and it's a sorrow to me that
we
> >> >>didn't share that moment together. I managed it
without him, but
> >I'd
> >> >>rather not have. And now he's absolutely crucial to our
daughters'
> >> >>growth and development - I wouldn't have it any other way.
> >> >
> >> >I'd like to believe that but the way you write here, I wonder.
> >>
> >>
> >> LSD
> >>
> >>
> >> lead singer disease
> >>
> >> raving egomania
> >>
> >> it all makes sense now
> >
> >Not the lead singer, dear, just one of two. The other one has balls
> >instead of boobs. Gives us a wide range of musical options.
> >
> >So I guess this LSD doesn't discriminate on the basis of gender. Go
> >figure.
>
>
> of course it doesnt. many male singers suffer from it as well. theres
> a great scene in the movie Almost Famous sort of describing it.
>
> singer: this article makes me sound like a dick!
>
> guitarist: you ARE a dick.
>
>
> there is a funny old musicians joke oft told by those with experience
> in such matters:
>
> theres two kinds of people in this world.
>
> those who adore chick singers.
>
> and those who have been in a working band with one.

Oh my poor dear husband. He's the drummer.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/15/05 9:23:55 PM ---