>> A problem I had with GNU indent is that it stuffed up the formatting
 >> of a switch statement that was nested.

 ac> I remember reading somewhere that it wasn't good
 ac> practise to nest a switch() statement within another.

Huh? Why not? It's perfectly valid to do so and if convenient.. well, why not?

 ac> I don't know if it is correct, or whether I actually
 ac> did read it, though.  So you might as well ignore what
 ac> I'm saying here.

Oh, ok. :-)

 ac> BTW, nested switch()es are pretty rare anyway, and you
 ac> can always fix them up later on if indent stuffs them
 ac> up.  ;-)

I've run indent over code with nested switches, and I don't recall any
particular problem. Could be a bug [:-)] in the version of indent I'm
using, however.

David

--- MaltEd/2 1.0.b6