In a msg to Fredric Rice on , George Jiri Opletal of 3:632/562 
writes:
 FR> I happened to be flipping the channels early this morning around
 FR> 4 am and came across some religious fundamentalist table discussion.
 FR> I don't remember the name of the program or who the participants
 GJO>  I have noticed a pattern here.  What people from skeptic post here in 
 GJO> U.F.O are fringe, weird, sicko, extreme stories to a large part.  My 
 GJO> personally, opinion (I am not the moderator), is that it is 
 GJO> unconstructive.  You know its BS and so do I.  How about post 
 GJO> something about the 'disc plane' of the 1950's with the central 
 GJO> turbine, which could of been misinterpreted as a flying disc, or 
 GJO> explanations of FOIA documents, or even some real alternatives to 
 GJO> explain reliable military sightings.
If you are so concerned about such things, why then did you fail to respond 
to any of the number of messages I posted here regarding specific sightings, 
abduction claims, etc.?  Yes, you responded to MJ-12 (oh, great, we can have 
a long discussion about a well-known hoax -- I can hardly wait to waste my 
time on _that_), but you didn't respond to the articles that you seem to be 
complaining about skeptics supposedly not posting (3 examples off the top of 
my head: I posted articles about Kenneth Arnold's original "saucer" sighting, 
the "Incident at Exeter," and a Goodland, Kansas, UFO claim).  I consider 
that very odd.
--- msgedsq 2.0.5
---------------