"Ben"  wrote in message
news:1108553610.518524.19460{at}g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> geopelia wrote:
> > "suckmysav"  wrote in message
> > news:421299a8_1{at}news.iprimus.com.au...
> > >
> > > "bluesmama"  wrote in message
> > > news:1108509813.845794.121520{at}z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > > >
> > > > suckmysav wrote:
> > > > > "geopelia" 
wrote in message
> > > > > news:DikQd.1608$1S4.165138{at}news.xtra.co.nz...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "suckmysav" 
wrote in message
> > > > > > news:pan.2005.02.15.08.36.27.608938{at}home.net...
> > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:03:34 +1300,
geopelia wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > "suckmysav"
 wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:42102ade_1{at}news.iprimus.com.au...
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> "geopelia"
 wrote in message
> > > > > > > >>
news:DhUPd.1280$1S4.120144{at}news.xtra.co.nz...
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > "S.Taylor"
 wrote in
> message
> > > > > > > >> >
news:vljv011p0i6tu9oeg6qm7o4cdqg33va1d5{at}4ax.com...
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > > What is the
purpose of woman?
> > > > > > > >> > > > A life-support
unit for a cunt.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > The reason women hate
this joke, is that it is true.
> They
> > > > know it,
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > >> > cannot admit it.
> > > > > > > >> > > If it wasn't true,
women have anger.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > How about a life-support
unit for a reproductive
> system and
> > > > resulting
> > > > > > > >> > offspring, to pass genes
on down the generations?
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Isn't that what he said? Or is
your point that he missed
> the
> > > > "boobs"
> > > > > > part?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > He also missed the womb and ovaries.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fair enough then. So, according to you a woman
> > > > > > > is nothing more than a life support system for
> > > > > > > a reproductive system?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm sure glad men have many and varied other
> > > > > > > uses. After all we can build bridges by day
> > > > > > > and sire children by night. It sure must suck
> > > > > > > to be a one dimensional as women apparently are.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Women too can do many other things, but where nature is
> concerned
> > > > > > reproduction is the most important function
of any creature,
> male
> > > > or female.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, some of them can cook and clean. I don't see them doing
> much in
> > > > > the way of great works though.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That all depends on who gets to set the criteria of what
> constitutes a
> > > > "great work".
> > >
> > > Well I suppose it does. This of course allows women to
> > > define "a great work"  as being "birthing a
baby" (which
> > > is no doubt the hidden message in your post) even though
> > > they are doing nothing at all other than responding to
> > > biological urges and "hoping and praying".
> > >
> > > Intelligent people of course won't buy such claptrap, and
> > > would recognise great works as being things that make a
> > > lasting difference to the world, whether that be the art of
> > > Michelangelo, the cure for cancer, or a bridge crossing a
> > > natural obstacle, thereby allowing travel and trade for
> > > hundreds, thousands or even  millions of people where
> > > before it was impractical.
> >
> > But how did those who did the "great works" come into the world?
>
>
> I have to assume that it's the same way that Hitler, Stalin, Dahmer,
> etc, came into the world.

Quite so.
Training and socialising has so much to do with the way individuals turn
out. In the early weeks, that is usually a woman's work. It ought to be the
mother, not some busy childcare place.

"The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world".





--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/16/05 5:24:26 PM ---