viking wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2005 15:20:53 -0800, "bluesmama"

> wrote:
>
> >Oh no, I'm quite serious. I think he'd be a happy nudist, that's
part
> >of it. He's quite comfortable in his skin. Good thing we have an
eight
> >foot fence!
>
> *smile* Sounds like it is a good thing indeed.
>
> By the way, sorry about my intemperate response--hadn't yet read
where
> you posted that you hadn't meant to lump me in with the rest back in
> your apology post.
>
> I know people here can be nasty, and I, and others I'm sure,
> appreciate that you don't lose your temper with them. Thanks for
> that--I know it can be an effort.

I didn't consider it intemperate, I hadn't thought that my comments
could be taken as derogatory towards my husband, so I appreciate the
chance to clear them up.

I know I lose my temper, I shouldn't, and am really trying to be less
sensitive.

That apology post (not the sincere one to you, the insincere one before
that!) was such a bad idea; frustration isn't a good writing companion
at all. I could have made my point in a much less nasty-tempered,
disrespectful way. I guess I was just feeling fed up, but that's no
excuse at all for such rude behavior. So I want to say I'm sorry for
the tone of that whole rant, and do beg everyone's pardon. I'll try to
be a much more respectful guest in the meantime, whether I agree or
not!

bluesmama



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/18/05 1:24:50 AM ---