03 Jun 15 16:09, you wrote to me:

 KR>>> hpt interprets one line as one echoarea to scan. But there is no
 KR>>> "fidotest 31" echoarea, isn't it? The
echomail.jam file includes
 KR>>> the echoarea tag plus the mail number to scan.

 ml>> either echomail tag or full path to jam area, i forget which...

 KR> Me too. ;) I remembered that too late but the mail was already on its way.
 KR> But anyway, who needs details?? :-) The first step is understanding a
 KR> system concept. Than you know where to rtfm the details.

hahaha... i hear ya... me? i just look at the how the software that brought
JAM to us operates... frontdoor, fastecho and remoteaccess bbs... i run all
three on my main system ;)

 ml>> it would be very nice if hpt were to provide full jam capability by
 ml>> reading the echomail.jam and netmail.jam files ;)

 KR> We should discuss the pros and cons between squish and jam before. ;)

why? i don't see any need... JAM support was added to the husky stuff...
husky message posting tools should create echomail.jam and netmail.jam as
per the JAM spec... tools that scan out messages from JAM bases should also
recognize and work properly with them without any need of additional
configuration... just using JAM should be enough ;)

)\/(ark

... Listen, you malfunctioning mess of microchips.
---