| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Next year for 1 GB ram as std? |
[ 31 Dec 02 00:09, Dave Ings wrote to John Oellrich ]
DI> I had a look at Rich's reference and all I can say is "ugh". Brings
DI> back = unpleasant memories of past systems I've worked on as they
DI> transitioned = from a lesser number of bits to a greater number.
DI> Segmented = architectures are evil, and cause no end of grief for the
DI> application = developer community.
(didn't read Rich's reference) Why? IIRC, each process is still limited to
it's own 4GB address space (or 2GB, or 3GB, depending on your kernel/OS).
Thanks to virtual memory, the fact that there is more is hidden by the
system, software shouldn't care.
-- Scott Little [fidonet#3:712/848 / sysgod{at}sysgod.org]
--- FMail/Win32 1.60+
* Origin: Cyberia: All your msgbase are belong to us! (3:712/848)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 712/848 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.