"Anonymous Remailer (austria)"  wrote
in news:1249e38066ede92486181af82d808a3e@remailer.privacy.at: 

> In article 
> Jax  wrote:
>>
>> "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" 
>> wrote in
>> news:beddf1f862bc0c33ed14333a333ab8f8@remailer.privacy.at: 
>> >
>> > Anyway, here's the story of how he failed this interview - the
>> > same way he manages to fail every other damn thing in life
>> > which others find rather simple to accomplish.
>>
>>
>> Mr Anon.... this discussion about Dustin's interview reminds me
>> of a couple of comments he made about another of his interviews.
>>
>> Kim Neely wrote an article in Rolling Stone magazine about virus
>> authors and Dustin's comments about talking to her are below.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Dustin wrote.....
>> "It's a known FACT that I didn't talk to Kim Neely"
>>
>> MID: 
>>
>>
>> Dustin previously wrote.....
>> "I spoke to Kim Neely"
>>
>> MID: 
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Does Dustin know when he's lying? It seems not.
>>
>> --
>> Jax!   :)
> 
> Oh, those are KEEPERS!

They sure are.

the rest of the sentence jax forgot to post:

I spoke to Kim Neely briefly, when she identified herself as a 
reporter, I +kb'd her domain and she had a followup OOB.

> How did I ever miss them?  Getting old, I guess.

I really don't know.
 
> It's a terrible thing to watch a National Treasure get torn apart
> in front of one's eyes. 

Isn't it though? How did you like the rest of the sentence? The MID 
supports me. :)
 
> Let's pull 'em apart a little bit more, Jax.

No need, I went ahead and did it for you, this time.


-- 
As a computer, I find your faith in technology amusing.



--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2