From: Mike '/m' 

On Wed, 21 May 2003 20:45:11 -0400, "Geo."  wrote:

>"Joe Barr"  wrote in message
>news:pan.2003.05.21.12.21.32.166480{at}austin.rr.com...
>
>> No, George, they should not.  For all the reasons that we have antitrust
>> laws on the books today, they should not.
>
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but the antitrust laws are there to protect the
>public? How is preventing microsoft from reducing the price of windows
>considered protecting the public? Do we now need to be protected from
>spending too little?


Fortunately the anti-trust laws take a longer-term view than you do.

 /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4