SD>DG> So why am I putting my hat in to join the FTSC? I like to understand
SD>DG> things from many angles before coming up with
SD>DG> enhancements/improvements or another way of doing things. I
SD>DG> dont know the FTSC, but I'm enjoying this technology and I
SD>DG> would like to see it live on. I also know its a dying art,
SD>DG> but at the moment I'm enthusiastic, so I'm keen to learn
SD>DG> and help.
 
SD> That's a good thing.  I'd like to have you aboard.
 
Let me repeat the words of Julie Andrews in 'The Sound of Music' ...
 
  "Strength doesn't lie in numbers" ..
 
There is already a multitude of non-techie and/or non-qualified people in the
FTSC ... why the need for more of the same ?
 
The FTSC doesn't need expanding, but halving, and still lose nothing of its
functionality.
 
Alexey Vissiaronov's frustration is realistic.
 
 \%/@rd

--- D'Bridge 3.99