Hello Thom!

02 May 04 11:50, you wrote to me:

 RC>> Otoh, with more and more spam being those damn worms, dont get so
 RC>> upset with people simply trying to protect themselves from both
 RC>> spam, worm infested or not. No spam prevention method is perfect,
 RC>> but dont expect people to only decide on the methods you approve
 RC>> of.

 TL> I am getting real tired of being told by various folks all about SPAM
 TL> and their mechanisims to fight it.....

To each their own, I already told you, no one method is foolproof.

 TL> ESPECIALLY when what they are
 TL> doing, in this particular case, is cluttering up my mail box and
 TL> bandwidth with messages that not only tell me the message is
 TL> rejected(which I really could care less about since the message was
 TL> notification to them in response to a message sent here, that is
 TL> intended for their beneift), but even more so that the message labels
 TL> the traffic from the echolist robot as spam, and on top of that tells
 TL> me to go to Hell.

False negatives and positives..

 TL> Now, as far as my own logic on spam....if the stuff is truly spam, do
 TL> we think the spammer will even see the insulting message, OR even care
 TL> about it?

I dont disagree here, but ones weapon of choice is exactly that, their choice.

 TL> So, I'm just gonna side track email from folks who use mechanisms that
 TL> aggravate me, whether it's a lot of bounced mail, or text that's
 TL> insulting.

Its all about you, isnt it?

==
Ross
ICQ: 5305939 | YAHOO: Kingoffido
E-Mail: rcassell [at] mailblocks [dot] com
Oxymoron = 33 years ago, John Kerry told Congress he was a war
criminal, 33 years later, he calls himself a war hero.

... Make like a banana and split.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-30512