"Avenger"  wrote in message
news:CyCRd.25516$ya6.22753{at}trndny01...
>
> "Hyerdahl"  wrote in message
> news:1108740060.587126.141920{at}z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > (edit)
> > > You are confusing the design of the process with the operator
> > > of the machinery. The gestation *process* is indeed of a very
> > > elegant design, and were I to ever meet the being who created
> > > that process I would surely shake his hand and congratulate
> > > him for his great achievment.
> >
> > You mean the Goddess?  :-)
> >
> > I used the word "operate" just above, but even that
implies too much
> > credit to the gestator.
> >
> > Sounds like sour grapes to me, Dave Sim.  I guess you and Deni didn't
> > have kids, eh?
> >
> > > The gestator does not need to operate anything. All she needs
> > > do is to continue to eat and drink, and sooner or later the odds
> > > are a baby will appear. She has done nothing at all that requires
> > > even the most minor amount of skill or creativity. She is just a
> > > biological machine that makes babies.
> > >
> > Well, as the little girl said to the boy in the cloakroom,
"with one of
> > what I've got, I can get as many of what you've got, as I want..." :-)
>
> That may be true but it does her no good since most females can't cum from
> sex and 99% of males can  lol
>
>
>
> >
> > > Lets apply that to the scenario you presented above.
> > >
> > > Creating the *science* that allows a baby to gestate outside
> > > of the mothers body is indeed a great achievement. Indeed, the first
> > > successfully "born" baby of such a procedure would
also be a great
> > > achievement. If you are going to claim credit points on behalf of
> > > women for their innate "ability to gestate babies, then
you have to
> > > infer the same credit points upon the inanimate machine that is also
> > > able to gestate babies. Are you  sure you want to do that? Are you
> > > sure you want women reduced to the same level as an inanimate
> > > machine, a mere device that is literally incapable of free will or
> > the
> > > ability to create something from nothing? Is that how you want us
> > > to view you gals? Just let me know, because I wont need a lot of
> > > pushing to start viewing women as soulless pieces of meat.
>
> Her "machinery" is useless without the magic ingredient, the
sperm which
> activates the dormant egg. It would be like having a car with no fuel, it
> just sits there and is useless. Besides, male reproductive anatomy is far
> more complex than female. A female can get pregnant AND deliver a baby
while
> she's unconscious lol It's just involuntary contractions to expel the
> foetus. Men are much more complicated. First, they must be conscious to
> impregnate a female. Just one aspect, having an erection, is more complex
> than giving birth and requires many steps both conscious and unconscious
to
> achieve.Females don't need to be stimulated to have sex and reproduce.

Just as well somebody invented Viagra!
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Feminists are not afraid to move into the future, Sim...because they
> > know women have inherent rights, just like men.
>
> Yes, you have the right to remain silent. NOW SHUTUP STUPID.
>
>
>
>
>




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/19/05 9:24:44 AM ---