You would of notice a great deal of supposed information which 
attempts to discredit the Majestic-12 documents (not discussing the 
Extraterrestrial recovery manual).  The person that posted it comes from the 
skeptics echo and does not reply to my answer in this echo, thus I have 
debunked these posts in skeptics.  Here is the summary of where mainly Philip 
Klass got it wrong...
       1) Claimed identical signatures provided evidence of photocopy and 
that a 3% increase in one signature is similar to a photocopying standard 
enlargement.
       However, the signatures are not identical, In the truman-forrestal 
document 'Harry' is 1.012 times longer than in the truman-bush document. Also 
the surmname, in the truman forrestal memo the 'Truman' is 1.032-1.04 times 
longer than the truman-bush memo.  The letterheard is also unchanged in all 
documents.  Thus the claim of photocoping is void.
       2) The claim the Cutler could not have written the Cutler-Twining memo 
since he was in Europe is also a extremely bad arguement.
       The actually document has no signature on it from Cutler or the /s? 
symbol.  If it had this things, it would be a fake.  There are a variety of 
example documents where Cutler gave instructions to his assistant James Lay 
to sent memo in Cutler's name to 'keep thing moving'.
       3) The waterpaper is wrong on the Cutler-Twining memo document.
       Wrong...the paper used was Fox paper as denoted on the document.  Fox 
paper was contacted and it stated that it made this paper between 1953 and 
early 1970's.  The document was dated 1954.
       The were other claims of false classification and marks, and other 
number issue, which however provided little serious evidence to class the 
documents a hoax (not including the later supposed Majestic-12 recovery 
manual).
       What it does clear show is that skeptics are just as much susceptible 
to excepting lies as are the extreme U.F.O groupies. 
--- FMail 1.22
---------------