"Hyerdahl"  wrote in message
news:1108740060.587126.141920{at}z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> (edit)
> > You are confusing the design of the process with the operator
> > of the machinery. The gestation *process* is indeed of a very
> > elegant design, and were I to ever meet the being who created
> > that process I would surely shake his hand and congratulate
> > him for his great achievment.
>
> You mean the Goddess?  :-)
>
> I used the word "operate" just above, but even that implies too much
> credit to the gestator.
>
> Sounds like sour grapes to me, Dave Sim.  I guess you and Deni didn't
> have kids, eh?
>
> > The gestator does not need to operate anything. All she needs
> > do is to continue to eat and drink, and sooner or later the odds
> > are a baby will appear. She has done nothing at all that requires
> > even the most minor amount of skill or creativity. She is just a
> > biological machine that makes babies.
> >
> Well, as the little girl said to the boy in the cloakroom, "with one of
> what I've got, I can get as many of what you've got, as I want..." :-)

That may be true but it does her no good since most females can't cum from
sex and 99% of males can  lol



>
> > Lets apply that to the scenario you presented above.
> >
> > Creating the *science* that allows a baby to gestate outside
> > of the mothers body is indeed a great achievement. Indeed, the first
> > successfully "born" baby of such a procedure would also
be a great
> > achievement. If you are going to claim credit points on behalf of
> > women for their innate "ability to gestate babies, then you have to
> > infer the same credit points upon the inanimate machine that is also
> > able to gestate babies. Are you  sure you want to do that? Are you
> > sure you want women reduced to the same level as an inanimate
> > machine, a mere device that is literally incapable of free will or
> the
> > ability to create something from nothing? Is that how you want us
> > to view you gals? Just let me know, because I wont need a lot of
> > pushing to start viewing women as soulless pieces of meat.

Her "machinery" is useless without the magic ingredient, the sperm which
activates the dormant egg. It would be like having a car with no fuel, it
just sits there and is useless. Besides, male reproductive anatomy is far
more complex than female. A female can get pregnant AND deliver a baby while
she's unconscious lol It's just involuntary contractions to expel the
foetus. Men are much more complicated. First, they must be conscious to
impregnate a female. Just one aspect, having an erection, is more complex
than giving birth and requires many steps both conscious and unconscious to
achieve.Females don't need to be stimulated to have sex and reproduce.




>
> Feminists are not afraid to move into the future, Sim...because they
> know women have inherent rights, just like men.

Yes, you have the right to remain silent. NOW SHUTUP STUPID.







--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/19/05 5:24:44 AM ---