-
-> J>Here we go again...
-> 
-> We?
We. You and me. 

 
-> J>You can not prove a negative is not provable,
-> 
-> I "proved" all I needed to. ;)

No, you did not. You assert an illogical conclusion.

That is not logical. :-)

-> 
-> 
-> J>unless nothing can be provable. :-)
-> 
-> J>Google: "Can you prove a negative?"
-> 
-> J>Click on the Logic Perfesser...and
-> 
-> J>follow his easy to understand and VERY logical
-> 
-> J>PROOF that you can and... do! :-)
-> 
-> J>Tell me how you are going to logically prove a positive 
-> 
-> J>without also beIng able to prove a negative.
-> 
-> J>(I am now out of this --- do look up the reference...
-> 
-> J>you'll feel good about it. :-)
-> 
-> 
-> You're spinning in circle, son.

You are mired in your refusal to learn? Fine with me.

I'm trying to extricate you from a logically impossible position.
-> 
-> Oh, and how do you prove a positive?...with evidence.
-> 
That has nothing to do with logic.

When you talk 'logic' you are merely prating 'common sense'; good stuff in
the real
world, as is measurment.

Knowing how to measure does NOT however, make you a mathematician.

You have an opportunity to learn a little logic without mental strain and
free
and you refuse. Not my problem.



--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5