TR>JB>Or NAMBLA.  Let's keep the experiment going.  Mimi, what do you
TR>JB>think of NAMBLA  ?

TR>Any persons open membership in such an organization should be taken
TR>as overt evidence of their pedophiliac tendencies, and they should be
TR>required to register as dangerous sexual predators.

That's not lawful, foo!

Someone can be gay while never having had gay sex, so why should any 
OTHER thought be illegal?

Of course you didn't bother to "think it out"...now did you?

Not to defend NAMBLA but they, again, ARE at least honest.
And since that line was introduced you and your ilk went "playground" on 
it. That's on you, little girl.


TR>Pop `that' into state laws........and watch how fast the NAMBLA
TR>organization becomes bereft of membership!

And you want less government? SURE!

TR>No more NAMBLA!

You're an idiot.

X CMPQwk 1.42 16554 XHe won't ban a fellow liberal. - Ed Hullet

--- Maximus/2 3.01