MP>> I noticed the following error using watcom 10.6 and I was interested in
MP>> knowing if anyone knows if its a known bug and been fixed. Also if its in 
MP>> earlier versions or not.

PE> I have Watcom 10.0, and I have the same problem as you.  Amazing how it 
PE> could have gone from 10.0 to 10.6 without anyone seeing it.  Fortunately 
PE> PDCOMM has the interrupt handler in assembler, eh?  :-)  BFN.  Paul.

MP> I feel real stupid now but I just realised that the code is actually
MP> correct.

Two identical pops is correct?  Oh, they need that extra pop to get the
stack back to how it used to be, right?  And they don't want to pop sp,
because sp is already correct.  Now you've made me feel real stupid.  :-) 
I think I'll have that interrupt handler back in "C" thanks all
the same.  :-)  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---