* Original to: Moderator

cc:Mimi Gallandt



 MG> Moderator -> MIMI GALLANDT wrote:
 M>> Hello MIMI!

 M>> 31 Dec 07 15:01, BOB KLAHN wrote to you:

 MG>>>> There you go confusing him with facts. Because Sauer can't
 MG>>>> get (let alone hang onto) a woman he's never had kids ergo
 MG>>>> he doesn't understand that whole dependent thing. Also
 MG>>>> there's the fact that welfare whores don't pay taxes...

 M>> [B]

 BK>>>  Is that experience speaking?

 BK>>>  You show yourself for the lowlife we all know you are.

 M>> [A]

 M>> I cant exactly moderate [A] in the face of [B]. whats your opinion?

 M>> You may publically reply to this if you choose, a waiver if you will.

 Interesting, the response to A, but not to B? Don't quite
 understand that.

 MG> When I say that I really don't care what Sauer, Klahn, Kemp
 MG> and Wilson think because I don't respect them or anything
 MG> that they think. It's blatantly obvious that Klahn is
 MG> talking out of his *ss because what he said is so bizarre
 MG> in the face of how many marriages I've been in and also I

 How many marriages is that?

 MG> frequently make comments on my children and grand children
 MG> demonstrates conclusively that *I* obviously know more
 MG> about tax credits or discounts.

 Um... where is there any indication that anyone cares what she
 knows about tax credits or discounts?

 MG> You are the moderator, what you do is good with me I just
 MG> wanted to remind the echo losers that what they jokingly
 MG> refer to as opinions are of less significance  or impost

 No, she just wanted to call a fellow participant a 'welfare
 whore'. And then she lies about her intent. And that is the part
 I was replying to. I really don't care about what she knows
 about tax credits or Vern Humphrey's horses.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... Murphy's Law explains things better than conspiracy theories.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5