suckmysav wrote:
> "bluesmama"  wrote in message
> news:1109077973.767353.203160{at}l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> [...]
>
>
> > If my children were attacked, I would defend them to the best of my
> > ability.
>
> Which is to say you would run screaming until some men came along and
saved them
> (and you)

My goodness, you don't believe me? Oh dear.

> > If my life was threatened, I would defend myself. If my
> > husband's life was threatened, I would assist him in his
> > defence of himself,
>
> Yeah, sure you would.

No, actually, because I love him so much, I'd just go and make some
popcorn and watch him get his butt kicked like it was an action film.
There, is that more in line with your stereotype?

No wait, let me get the chocolates and the hair curlers and the fluffy
slippers. That's better.

And maybe while I'm watching the love of my life and the father of my
children beaten, I can make some calls about his life insurance; I've
had my eye on the pool boy and he's sure look fine driving me around in
a nice shiny "Bangkok Whore Red" Lexus....

> > though as he's much bigger and stronger than me, I'm sure he
> > wouldn't need my help.
>
> See what I mean? You are only talking hypotheticals here and yet
> you are already reaching for the excuse box.

Was that the excuse box? Damn it. I was reaching for the bon-bons.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/23/05 1:50:53 PM ---