On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 21:58:37 +0000, Peter J Ross
 wrote:

>On Wednesday 23 February, Aratzio wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:31:12 +0000, Peter J Ross
>>  transparently proposed:
>
>>>On Monday 21 February, Aratzio wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:05:13 GMT, Kali  wrote:
>>>
>>>>>In article
, posted
>>>>>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:17:06 GMT, Aratzio a6ahlyv02{at}sneakemail.com
>>>>>says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:24:18 GMT, jet{at}untool.net (jet) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You know, it amazes me how many people are
defending kookology in
>>>>>>>support groups, particularly spooge, who spent
months bitching at
>>>>>>>me for a couple posts to a support group, for
which I had already
>>>>>>>apologised to the group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And you have seem Kali apologize and yet you seem
unwilling to accept
>>>>>>her apology. Does your hypocrisy have any bounds?
>>>>>
>>>>>I haven't apologized, and neither did Jet. Just an
>>>>>acknowledgement of stepping over a line and vowing not to
>>>>>repeat it. On that, it is the same thing. And yes, she is quite
>>>>>a hypocrite. But maybe she is just determined to see someone
>>>>>else suffer the "months bitching" that she says she
>>>>>experienced. She points to my occasional posts in support
>>>>>groups over the years as evidence of abuse, when that is simply
>>>>>not the case. But I honestly believe that she can't get her
>>>>>brain around it, so perhaps it is just as silly of me to try to
>>>>>explain it to her as it is for her to carry on as she does.
>>>>>
>>>>>Kali
>>>
>>>> I thought it was you that said they, on occasion, had
failed to sneck
>>>> the x-post. Not by intent, but just because you failed to notice the
>>>> x-post. Or was that Ross?
>>>
>>>I think I was the one who said that. Does *anybody* always check the
>>>newsgroups line before sending a reply?
>>>
>>>It's a good idea to be especially cautious when replying to known
>>>support group trolls like Humphries, Gore and Shambat, of course.
>>>
>>>PJR :-)
>
>> The words flow, the chortles happen, the post is sent. Then one looks
>> at the froups line and finds that the message was sent to places you
>> did wish. Kenny Kakes and the socmans also fit that same bill. It is
>> the age old question of intent. Was the intention to troll a support
>> group? Those that set the follow-ups or froups to the support groups
>> or those that respond without taking the time to look. I will take the
>> latter any day.
>
>I was forgetting the socmen and their liking for trolling in
>alt.support.marriage and alt.support.divorce. The fat little worm
>known as Michael Snyder was especially fond of such crossposts, IIRC.
>
>PJR :-)

As you pointedly reminded me some time back when I was having a grand
ole time with a socman (Harry Ballsac IIRC).

--

Jet channelling the whole of usenet in support of Snuh:
Message-ID: 

That means the majority of people on usenet,
including most news admins (like Russ and Jeremy)
are on the side of Snuh, because they think you're
a waste of human life, too.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/23/05 9:50:56 PM ---