ml>> now, how do you suppose i'm to test and know that stuff from
 ml>> your system will get thru the filter if you're unwilling to
 ml>> assist? after all, it did get caught at least once... how do
 ml>> you suppose that /we/ work together on this to correct this
 ml>> problem?

 TL> Don't know....I believe someone suggested whitelisting...but

dude... aren't you one of the moderators of the GIGO support forum?? have
you simply forgotten that i run GIGO over here? have you forgotten
everything you ever knew about GIGO?

 TL> that's not my place to say....I'm just not willing to even
 TL> have to read stuff that insults me.....

then configure /*your*/ stuff to not generate those messages in responce to
response codes that other's systems may reply with...

 TL> and if you
 TL> automatically send it, well, then I ain't gonna process your
 TL> stuff.

how many frickin times do you have to be told that /YOUR EFFIN SYSTEM
GENERATED THOSE DAMNED MESSAGES!/ criminy!

 TL> Further, I wouldn't even presume to ask you to change the
 TL> contents of your 551 message.

that's already been done...

of course, the obvious thing to have done would have been to ask me if
there was a problem in my stuff because your server wasn't able to deliver
the responses to the updates and that you were getting a 551 response
code... that would have caused this entire discussion to have never
existed... oh well, you stepped in it and now we've both got it all over
us...

 TL> I look forward to seeing your update messages via netmail.

does this mean that i'm cut off from doing them via email as you /told/ me
to do a few years back when i started doing it this way??

)\/(ark