TL> mark lewis wrote in a message to Thom LaCosta:

 TL>> So, I'm just gonna side track email from folks who use
 TL>> mechanisms that aggravate me, whether it's a lot of bounced
 TL>> mail, or text that's insulting.

 ml>> look! dagnabit! i'm not using any special mechanisms or
 ml>> filters or whathaveyou to block shit... its a simple rule in
 ml>> my SMTP server... who cares what the fricking thing says...

 TL> I do, because I have to read the dim-bulb message.

the message that /YOUR SYSTEM/ created... not my system... you never got
close enough to my system to even drop off the messages you were trying to
deliver...

 ml>> all you need to know is
 ml>> that you got a 551 error code and that's all you need to
 ml>> base your responses on...

 TL> Please don't even begin to even think you can tell me upon
 TL> what I should base my responses.

then you need to learn more about these mystical majikal spells and
incantations that work on email to get it delivered or rejected...

 ml>> please get your facts together...

 TL> They are quite together...your system sent me a message that
 TL> contained insulting information.

incorrect, again... my system replied to your system's attempt to connect
and drop off mail... my system's reply was a 551 errorcode and the
connection was terminated... /YOUR/ system evidently accepted that
errorcode and generated a message to the sender of the attempted to be
delivered mail (that would be your highness) and placed it in their
mailbox... take a close look at the headers in those messages and i can
guarantee that you'll discover that they came no where near my machine...

)\/(ark