"The sound of feminists wailing and gnashing of teeth is music almost that 
to rival the celestial harmonies in the pleasure it brings via my ears... 
(anonymous mystic anti-feminist gender warrior way back in 2005)

http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/r/roberts/2005/roberts022205.htm
The Pink Pussy-Cat Bares Her Fangs

February 22, 2005



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by Carey Roberts

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following their November 2 electoral melt-down, the Sisterhood and the rest 
of the radical Left lapsed into bitterness and despair. Sensing that Middle 
America is turning a cold shoulder on their socialist agenda, the rad-fems 
have now unleashed a last-ditch campaign of intimidation, accusations, and 
threats.

On January 9, former Indiana representative Tim Roemer announced he was 
running for the top post of the Democratic National Committee. Many believed 
Roemer was exactly the boost the wilting Democratic Party needed - someone 
with a moderate ideology, fresh ideas, and Midwestern roots. But there was a 
slight problem: Mr. Roemer is a Catholic, and his resume' revealed a 
pro-life voting record.

That was more than the pro-abortion jihadists in the Democratic Party could 
stomach.

With cat-like stealth, "they" put together an "opposition
research memo," 
pol-speak for a smear campaign. I put "they" in quotation marks because no 
one was willing to admit who perpetrated the hatchet job.

Next, Nancy Keenan, incoming president of NARAL Pro-Choice America (that's a 
feel-good name, isn't it?) powered up the feminist buzz-saw. She ordered 
NARAL's state affiliates to pressure the 447 DNC delegates to toe the 
pro-abortion line.

Roemer is as feisty a politician as you will get. But the NARAL activists 
turned his abortion views into a single-issue litmus test, and soon he was 
forced to withdraw. An angered Roemer later commented they "tried to make 
abortion the radioactive anvil that hung around my neck.They threw two 
kitchen sinks at me."

Then just five days after Roemer announced his DNC candidacy, Harvard 
president Lawrence Summers made a comment that "innate
differences" between 
the sexes may account for why top science positions are filled mostly by 
males. Sitting in the audience was one MIT professor Nancy Hopkins. Upon 
hearing his remarks, Hopkins nearly swooned and had to exit the room.

The Fearsome Felines became so enraged over Summers' suggestion that they 
mounted a campaign designed to embarrass and humiliate the Harvard 
president. Summers soon confessed to his ideological revisionism and 
commenced a round of self-criticism. But that wasn't enough, and now the 
N.O.W operatives are calling for a complete ideological cleansing.

Dismayed by the Soviet show-trial atmosphere at Harvard, civil-liberties 
lawyer Harvey A. Silvergate remarked, "The modern university is the 
culmination of a 20-year trend of irrationalism marked by an increasingly 
totalitarian approach to highly politicized issues."

The missteps of Roemer and Summers were bad enough, but after all, they were 
made by members of the male oppressor class. What really stirs up a cat 
fight, though, is when a woman - a woman! - hisses at the Sisterhood.

That's what happened on February 13, when the Los Angeles Times ran a piece 
by Charlotte Allen. Commenting on the dearth of female intellectuals, Allen 
explained, "Ideological feminism has ghettoized and trivialized the subject 
matter of women's writing."

The feminist catechism does not take well to apostasy, and it fell to one 
Susan Estrich to deliver the ex-communication. Estrich is the ultra-liberal 
University of South California law professor who likely would have been John 
Kerry's first nomination to the United States Supreme Court.

First, Estrich broadcast a thermonuclear e-mail accusing the Times of 
"blatant sex discrimination" and calling for a quota for female
columnists. 
Worst of all, she branded Miss Allen a "feminist-hater." Off with her head!

Then in an exchange of e-mails with opinion-page editor Michael Kinsley, 
Estrich pulled out every intimidation tactic in the book. She threatened to 
approach the LA Times advertisers. She accused the Times' male editors of 
"unconscious discrimination"  -- how's that for the mother of all guilt 
trips?

And then showing incredibly bad taste, she suggested that Kinsley's health 
"may have affected your brain, your judgment, and your ability to do this 
job." But Kinsley refused to give in to Estrich's sourpuss demands.

Estrich made a slight miscalculation, though - she cc'ed her hot-head 
threats to the Examiner. This past Saturday the Examiner published the 
entire acerbic exchange.

Now, the cat is out of the bag, so to speak. Let's just say that Susan 
Estrich is no longer on anyone's short list for the U.S. Supreme Court.

Anyone who has had dealings with the rad-fems knows how they rely on every 
type of psychological, social, and legal manipulation to get their way. Give 
them an inch, and they take a mile. In the past, these machinations took 
place behind closed doors, so the public remained in the dark. But now, 
their storm-trooper tactics have come out of the closet, for all the world 
to see.

Hooray for editor Michael Kinsley and all the other men and women who Just 
Say No to the feminist bullies.


Carey Roberts






--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/25/05 9:33:15 AM ---