From: "Geo." 

"Antti Kurenniemi"  wrote in
message news:45d68efc$1{at}w3.nls.net...

>> What I have a problem with is some of the conclusions they come to with
>> absolutely no or at best very questionable science.
>
> And you can judge that because...? Are you saying you understand all
> things better than any of the scientists,

OMG Antti..

I work for an ISP, but when I get quoted by the media about a security
issue they make me out to be a security expert and use titles like
"security specialist" or "security researcher". These
"scientists" that are being quoted, they are people like you or
me, most of them are guys who work for ADM or someone else who has a
specific monentary interest in what path we choose.

Some of them are smart, some are idiots, the media sure as hell can't tell
the difference and present opinions from both as being facts straight from
the "scientists"..

I tell you guys PHP is a security nightmare, others "security
experts" who make money selling PHP based products claim it's not, who
do you trust?

Who are you going to listen to, the ADM sponsored bunch or the independent
scientist who rarely gets any press coverage? The UN based bunch, these are
not scientists, these are people with connections, sponsored by folks like
ADM or Monsanto or any of a dozen other major players. Do not trust them.

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5