The corollary of your argument is that it's neither the fault of men or
the duty of men to provide money for women either, though I can see how
you'd conveniently ignore that.

It makes no difference what you think you complete buffoon, it's
refusal of lunatics like yourself to recognise reality that is causing
women to be raped. Macroscopic voting patterns may get you the money,
it may get you the right to free divorce and the house, and the
children, and healthcare when you've never paid a day's tax in your
life, but what it also gets you is men with hard-ons and hammers
walking the street very unhappy with women. A wife using the law to
throw her husband out onto the street from the house he's bought,
doesn't make him happy. You don't seem to realise that all the
privileges in the world come at a cost.

Not that Harriet Harmanhater cares about these men. She doesn't care
about the women that are raped either, because at just 2,000 a year,
they aren't enough to vote her out.  She just carefully stage manages
her disgust, in order to keep the majority of women thinking that
voting for her is a step in the right direction, when in fact it's
causing more women down the line to get raped. As a politician playing
with, and destroying people's lives, she's the worst kind of monster.

It's a simple fact that when something fucks men off, they attack it.
Just look at America. America's fucked off loads of people and they're
attacking it. Men don't do this consciously, they don't do it for
altruistic reasons, they just do it. If america fucks off men, they
attack it. If the jews fuck of men, they attack it. If women fuck off
men, what? You gonna get your SIG P225 out, and whack every man that
comes within 10 feet of you, just on the off chance that the one
nearest to you at any given moment is going to be the one whose had his
last straw? Don't be a fuckhead.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/25/05 9:33:27 PM ---