| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: What`s wrong with pursuing economic interests in the nam |
A very well written post from a normal human. Thanks!
--
_________________-
BOCH
________________
A+TECH
_________
"Society" wrote in message
news:1144hvkt0ivpb03{at}corp.supernews.com...
>
> "HombreVIII" wrote in message
> news:3ae8s6F69ifd3U1{at}individual.net...
>>
>> "Lionel" wondered...
>>> Why is it so wrong to blow away people who
>>> attacked us and steal their economic resources,
>>> no matter how valuable? Arabs attacked the
>>> US and Europe first and we retaliated. To the
>>> victor go the spoils. So what is the problem here?
>>
>> It wasn't just Arabs who attacked us, it was people
>> with two arms! [...]
>
> Lessee, Arabs (and non-Arab Muslims) were
> dancing in the streets to express their solidarity
> with the 9/11 attackers. The condemnations
> of the terrorists by Arabs and Muslims living
> outside the US and Europe are -- where?
> Thus, to lay blame collectively on Arabs is
> not the overbroad generalization you wish
> it to be, HombreVIII.
>
> In contrast, plenty of two-armed people are
> in active opposition to the 9/11 terrorists.
> Thus, your silly example, HombreVIII, is
> an overbroad generalization. (Duh.)
>
>> [...] Or, maybe we should just admit that
>> converse accident is a fallacy like
>> logicians have been saying for centuries.
>
> I suggest you study your logic more carefully.
>
> --
> Men are people too. This fact shocks many
> and infuriates feminists.
>
--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/1/05 4:47:48 AM ---
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.