"Gunner"  wrote in message
news:i61q411ugqrnlkun67ii9p9dhjeu4cra9r{at}4ax.com...
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:29:02 GMT, "David Lentz"
>  wrote:
>
> >
> >"Samuel Goldstine"  wrote in message
> >news:c53p41h7qfqgt6bej9781145bhh2puph57{at}4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:16:43 -0700, TDKozan
 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> >So maybe you'd care try reading the court's actual opinion?  Try
> >> >starting on page 3
> >> >
> >> >http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200511628reh2.pdf
> >>
> >>
> >> the court also said that blacks were 3/5 of a person and that
> >> integration is illegal..   that make those rulings right also..?
> >
> >What is this, more outcome based education?   The above assertion is
plain
> >ignorant.
> >
> >David
> >
> Ah...Dave...review Dred Scott..then get back to us, ok?

Scott v. Sandford never refered to person has three fifths of a person:


http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=60&page=393

Good luck finding such a attribution in the text.

David




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/1/05 12:47:52 PM ---