TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: surv_rush
to: TOM ENRIGHT
from: ROBERT PLETT
date: 1998-01-09 12:11:00
subject: Gates vs Reno 01/

On 01-08-98, TOM ENRIGHT declared to DAVID HARTUNG:
TE>What about Microsoft's little policy of *requiring* vendors to
TE>buy Internet Explorer in order to be *allowed* to purchase
TE>Windows 95?
Was that truly the situation, or was it rather that Win95 was simply
unavailable without it?
Is it not the case that components of IE are an integral part of the
platform itself, meaning that while it *can* be removed, some of it
necessarily will always remain?
I don't have or use Win95, so I'm asking based on things I've only
heard. |-)
Bob     /\-/\   - proud Ilk   homebody@galstar.com
C.A.T. ( o o ) Chapter Ilks
       == ^ ==
Green Country - Oklahoma      http://www.galstar.com/~homebody/
 * SLMR 2.1a * DesqView 386: No Hourglass Needed!
---------------
* Origin: Shadow of The Cat (1:170/1701.10)

SOURCE: echomail via exec-pc

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.