On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:10:10 -0800, "Society"
 wrote:

>
> wrote in message 
>news:1112231042.944302.187070{at}z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Society wrote:
>>>
>>> [Among other swerves] into unreality Michael C.
>>> Morris takes in this article is his "we also need
>>> everyone... to" blah blah blah plea.  Feminism is a
>>> political movement born of a fascist demand that
>>> everyone conform to its demands. [...]
>>
>> 
>>
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050330/ap_on_re_as/laura_bush_afghanistan
>>
>>   "KABUL, Afghanistan - Inspired by Afghan women
>>   who have boldly shed their burqas after years of
>>   Taliban repression, Laura Bush urged more
>>   educational opportunities and greater rights
>>   for women
>
>...but none for men...
>
>>   Wednesday in this war-wrecked nation."
>>
>> v curious -- distribution of feminism around
>> the planet by this neoconservative cabal [...]
>
>"Neoconservative", ooh!  and wiggles fingers>  "Neoconservative" is
>just left liberal* code for "International Jewish
>Conspiracy/Zionist Occupied Government".

Say it isn't so!  That sounds so insensitive and judgmental and angry.
The liberals tell us all the time that they are never, never any of
those things. They want nothing but more "diversity" in the world but
only so long as those diverse people agree with them.  
>
>IMO, Laura Bush travelled to Afghanistan so she
>could wear outfits considered racy without any
>change to her wardrobe.  ;-)

I don't believe her motives were as innocent or frivolous as even
that.  She should IMO drop the cheerleading for girls stuff and devote
more time to promoting two parent heterosexual families like the ones
she and George and their daughters grew up in if she needs to take up
a "cause." 
>

>
>NOTE:
>   * "liberal" in the US refers to someone who
>    is "illiberal".

If a rose is a rose is a rose then it is equally true that a liberal
by any other name (like "progressive") is still a plain old socialist.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/1/05 8:48:01 PM ---