"Gunner"  wrote in message
news:kuvq41dna12b6cbg1d9lpa56q2vq07knkc{at}4ax.com...
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:29:31 GMT, "David Lentz"
>  wrote:
>
> >
> >"Gunner"  wrote in message
> >news:i61q411ugqrnlkun67ii9p9dhjeu4cra9r{at}4ax.com...
> >> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:29:02 GMT, "David Lentz"
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Samuel Goldstine"  wrote in
message
> >> >news:c53p41h7qfqgt6bej9781145bhh2puph57{at}4ax.com...
> >> >> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:16:43 -0700, TDKozan

wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >So maybe you'd care try reading the court's
actual opinion?  Try
> >> >> >starting on page 3
> >> >> >
> >> >>
>http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200511628reh2.pdf
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> the court also said that blacks were 3/5 of a person and that
> >> >> integration is illegal..   that make those rulings
right also..?
> >> >
> >> >What is this, more outcome based education?   The above
assertion is
> >plain
> >> >ignorant.
> >> >
> >> >David
> >> >
> >> Ah...Dave...review Dred Scott..then get back to us, ok?
> >
> >Scott v. Sandford never refered to person has three fifths of a person:
> >
> >
>
>http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=60
&page=393
> >
> >Good luck finding such a attribution in the text.
> >
> >David
> >
>
> Ah...Dave?  What was the decision of the court in this case?
>
> or do you wish to remain literal and ignore the implications?
>
> Gunner

Concesssion accepted.

David




--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/1/05 8:47:53 PM ---