John Templeton wrote:
> Hyerdahl wrote:
> > John Templeton wrote:
> > > Hyerdahl wrote:
> > > > JerryWong wrote:
> > > > > The fundamental theorem of men and women is as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > > Part 1
> > > > > Every woman needs a man but not every man needs a woman.
> > > >
> > > > That doesn't make much sense to me, since women
> are...today...doing> everything men are doing PLUS they can gestate
their own family, quite
> without any particular man.  She is the unit.  He is the other.
> > > >
> > > Male scientists can gestate their own families in labs hehe.
> >
> >   Not yet they can't.  And btw, so could female scientists.
> > >
> Umm yea they can. Maybe not in Hickville, Illinois where you live,
but
> it's been done for many different species in labs all over the world.
> Female scientists? BOTH of them?


To date there are no known human beings generated BY men IN labs, and
every person born into this world has arrived thru a particular woman's
body.

(edit)
>  Not so> for women.  Take two scientists:  Iscaac Newton and
> Marie Curie.  Both> are famous.  Both worked hard.  Yet Newton was a
>loner> Marie had a> husband.  Some women probably sense a threatening
> tone in this> article.  Relax.  I am just starting to develop this
> theory.
> > > >
> Well,  it would be nice if you actually had some facts to back
> you> up,> dear, but here are many single female scientists:  I'll
give
> you> a> few > and you can look up more yourself.  Let's do keep in
mind
> that today > women need not marry to work for equal pay, so keep you
eyes open as> the female scientists of today razzle and dazzle you.
> > > >
> > > > Hildegard of Bingen 1098  (She was a nun)
> > > >
> > > > Barbara McClintock  1902Born 1902, Brooklyn, New York
> > > > B.A. 1923, Cornell University
> > > > Ph.D. 1927, Cornell University, Botany
> > > > 1927-1931, Instructor in Botany, Cornell University
> > > > 1931-1933, Fellow, National Research Council
> > > > 1933-1934, Fellow, Guggenheim Foundation
> > > > 1934-1936, Research Associate, Cornell University
> > > > 1936-1941, Assistant Professor, University of Missouri
> > > > 1942-1967, Staff member, Carnegie Institution of Washington's
> > > > Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
> > > > 1967-1992, Distinguished Service Member, CIW Department of
> > Genetics,
> > > > Cold Spring Harbor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Henrietta Swan Leavitt,
> > > > b. July 4, 1868, d. December 12, 1921
> > > > A deaf, female scientist-over 100 years ago!
> > > >
> > > > Annie Jump Cannon
> > > >
> > > > http://www.mada.org.il/website/html/eng/2_1_1-31.htm
> > > > Annie Jump Cannon was the eldest of three daughters of Wilson
> > Cannon,
> > > a
> > > > Delaware shipbuilder and state senator, and his second wife,
Mary
> > > Jump.
> > > > Annie's mother taught her the constellations and stimulated her
> > > > interest in astronomy...Cannon also published catalogs of
> variable
> > > > stars (including 300 she discovered). Her career spanned more
> than
> > > > forty years, during which women in science won grudging
> acceptance.
> > > She
> > > > received many "firsts" (first recipient of an honorary
doctorate
> > from
> > > > Oxford, first woman elected an officer of the American
> Astronomical
> > > > Society, etc.). At Harvard she was named Curator of
Astronomical
> > > > Photographs, but it was only in 1938, two years before her
> > > retirement,
> > > > that she obtained a regular Harvard appointment as William C.
> Bond
> > > > Astronomer.
> > > > 1944, Member, National Academy of Sciences
> > > > 1945, President, Genetics Society of America
> > > > 1967, Kimber Medal
> > > > 1970, National Medal of Science
> > > > 1981, Lasker Award
> > > > 1983, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
> > >
> > > These *female* scientists are remarkable. That's exactly the
point.
> > > Male scientists with equal or greater achievements are hardly
> > > remarkable.
> >
> > These female scientists are all SINGLE WOMEN, Steve; they need not
> > account for male oppression; they rose above it.  The point here is
> > that women should not have to do everything men WHILE OPPRESSED,
but
> > they...
> > ...have.  :-)
>
> That's not the point.

That IS THE point that refutes your 'theory'; asked and answered.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/31/05 8:47:40 PM ---