18 Jun 16 16:16, you wrote to Maurice Kinal:

 MK>> Yes.  From this angle it appears to get truncated at 60 characters
 MK>> rather than the 72 characters as per traditional ftn specs for the
 MK>> subject.  This could be significant if subject is used to trigger a
 MK>> response which it sometimes is, such as in areafixes or file
 MK>> requests.

 AI> Ah.. I was not aware of this, or even that there was a spec.

FTS-0001 ;)

 MK>> Please note if a bluewave offline editor responds as they won't
 MK>> prepend a 'Re: ' to the original subject since it is greater than 69
 MK>> characters.  That is why I call it a Goldilocks subject.

 AI> I am replying with multimail just to see if anything changes.

in what format? QWK, QWKE, or BW???

 AI> Do you know where I can findthis spec? Being on spec is one of the
 AI> design goals of mystic so..

which spec? O:)

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey

... BBSers are virtually alive.
---