| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Is Pluto a planet? |
->> DW> The word ->> DW> "party" was purely a noun when I was a kid. Then people ->> DW> started using it as a verb, and this is now accepted usage. ->> DW> The same sort of thing seems to be happening to the word ->> DW> "text", in the context of sending cellphone text messages. ->> If someone challenged these claims, you would resort to an ->> appeal to authori to support them. DW> No I wouldn't! I'd just use my own memory of how things have DW> changed over the last few decades. Ok. I was wrong about you, then. Usually, when there is a "discussion" over the meaning of a word, people go for the dictionary. They use the dictionary as an authority. An authority that establishes definitions. I guess you're are saying that YOU are the authority when you are one of the folks participating in such "discussions". Regardless, it's still an appeal to authority. ->> Moreover, there is no currently accepted definition of a ->> planet. You could find one in a dictionary, but that wouldn't ->> do, since here we are talking ab a scientific definition. ->> Scientific definitions almost always differ from common ->> definitions. DW> In English, dictionaries publish fake definitions of words DW> that, in reality, are defined only by the shifting DW> conventions of usage. In some other languages, definitions DW> are established by some authoritative governing body, such as DW> the Academie Francaise or the Real Academia Espan~ola. When DW> the governing body issues an edict, publishers of DW> dictionaries, grammar books, etc., rush to follow suit. But DW> in English, we have no such body. Dictionaries have to follow DW> *us*, the common speakers of the language. Interesting. I didn't know that about dictionaries. Regardless, there is still no accepted definition among the experts in the field for the term "planet". And this will continue to be true until there is such a consensus. And when, if ever, there is such a consensus, how will we know without an appeal to authority? The question's rhetorical. We won't have any way of knowing unless we appeal to the experts in the field. In other words, until we appeal to authority. ---* Origin: Big Bang (1:106/2000.7) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.