Hello Mimi!

19 Jan 08 21:24, you wrote to me:

 RC>> and when you call him stupid, a moron among other things, should
 RC>> I get involved?

 MG> Calling him stupid or a moron isn't accusing him of committing a
 MG> crime, saying Stan smoked an illegal substance is accusing Stan of
 MG> committing a crime. I could have sworn that was against the rules
 MG> here. I'm pretty sure I remember Alan jumping my case about pointing
 MG> out how Sauer owning a gun was illegal from one of two ways.

We aint going to play this game, I wrote the rules..

I never said I was going to be hyper-anal in enforcing them, I also said I
was never going to moderate this echo like POL_INC, if I did, ALL OF YOU
would have been enjoying vacations and most of you would have been on
multiple vacations at this point.. Hell John Massey cant pass gas in
POL_INC without Ceppa vacationing him.

I have seen you called the female B word, many times, I cannot fault you
for defending yourself.

I do not condone Sauers accusations, this is not the first time he has
projected a lie onto others. I have said something to him about it tonight.

But if you want to march out the echorules, can you honestly sit and tell
me that his debating opponents have been observing them to the letter?

Do you want me to pull them out and apply them to every message in the past
week, month or 90 days? If I did, it would take me a while to moderate
people for it.

The point I am trying to make here is when you wrestle with pigs,
eventually you cant tell the wrestler apart from the pigs, too much mud.

Sauer is not totally innocent, nor is he in total guilt, he does go over
the top in responses, but I cannot ignore the fact that his opponents carry
similiar guilt and innocense.


--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-30413