[...]
 >  JS> The oldie but still goodie is, "There is no evidence that UFOs are a
 >  JS> threat to national security." (paraphrased) I think this came out in
 >  JS> the 1960s sometime. ...Or maybe at the close of Project Bluebook.
 >  JS> At any rate, it's about the closest the government has come to
 >  JS> admitting the existance of UFOs.
 >  Its a paradoxical stand by the NSA, as after the judge viewed the
 > affidavit, he dismissed the case by stating,
 >        'the in-camera affidavit present factual considerations
 > which aided the court in determining that the public interests in
 > disclosure is far outweighed by the sensitive nature of the
 > materials and the obvious effect on national security their
 > release may well entail.'
 >        The documents were not released.  When I get the time, I
 > will post the question section by CAUS to the NSA in the court
 > room.
The judge in the above must have had some insight into the black
budget requirements of the NSA. These agencies create their own
problems by developing new weapons-systems that are then tested
in some little war somewhere which requires the spending of big
bucks the agencies want to themselves. Now, that is indeed a
paradox. ...If not a paradox, certainly a catch-22.
Regards,
Jack
--- FMail 1.22
---------------