GL Fowler (kmas{at}NOSPAM.com) writes:
> On 4 Apr 2005 07:38:59 -0700, "bluesmama"

> wrote:
>
>>J wrote:
>>> Equal rights is a very limited thing. The sexes are not the same, nor
>>> are they equal in any one thing (for the most part).
>>
>>Well the sexes are obviously not the same, but do you believe that one
>>sex is better than the other? More valuable to the functioning of
>>society than the other?
>
> The stirring stick you just stuck in here better have hand gripes!!

Indeed. Let sexist sow "bluesmama" point to major technologies
invented and built by women. Like, for example, wheres all the
built-by-women jetliners ? Space shuttles ? Cars ? Busses ?

So, its abundantly clear that, if you want a society living above
the grass hut level ( See Camille Paglia, Sex Art And American
Culture, introduction ), you need men, but don't much need women.

> My first reaction here is troll bait and liberal use of "N" ext key
> is the only appropriate response.

Sure. But, her hate of men is such as to need her to question men's
worth, and try to imply that men are of no more use to a society
than women, namely, as consumers and not as producers.

Now, when women start to produce *more* than they consume ( Even
PBS' Wall Street Week stated that women control some 85% of all
discretionary consumer speding: Notice that we don't much hear
of *that* " wage gap "... ), then the " question " won't be an
insane one.

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
                                    The Man Prayer, Red Green.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/4/05 9:01:16 PM ---