Hi, Dallas Hinton!
I read your message from 16.03.2018 16:18
ak>> University had ordered Thursday that the cables be tightened, Mr.
ak>> I would write it with "to":.... it had ordered Thursday that the
ak>> cables _to_ be tightened.
ak>> Is there any difference?
DH> I'm afraid you simply can't say that!! You could say "cables should
DH> be" or "cables will be" or even "cables are to be", but not "cables
DH> to be tightened" -- there's no verb in your version.
No any verb? Let's see this example:
"The manager ordered the cargo _to_ be insured."
Bye, Dallas!
Alexander Koryagin
ENGLISH_TUTOR 2018
--- Paul's Win98SE VirtualBox
* Origin: Quinn's Post - Maryborough, Queensland, OZ (3:640/384)
|