G'Day Michael,
 
-=> Quoting Michael Stapleton to Frank Adam <=-

 MS> Fine, I don't give a stuff about C++.
Hm, knowing other languages is not entirely a bad thing IMO.
 
 FA>> see a lot of mov ah 30h
 FA>>              int 21h 
 FA>>              cmp ??..
 FA> I didn't say it'll compile, i don't know much assembly apart
 FA> from sort of able to read some of it.
 MS> Fine, but why did you show me some foreign assembler code?
Foreign ?
Anyway, this is what my disassembler (IDA V1.05) actually comes up with... 

mov     ah, 30h ; '0' ; ** VOID **
int 21h         ; DOS - GET DOS VERSION
                ; Return: AL = major version number (00h for DOS 1.x)
 
Dammit you're right, it's a Belgian disassembler. :)
 
 FA>> It still bugs me, there HAS TO BE a table within DOS somewhere !
  MS>> Good luck finding it.  And thanks for giving me yet another
 MS>> reason why I shouldn't learn about your DOS.  :)
  FA> Oi ! It's more challenging working with it. :-)

 MS> More challenge than what?
Since we were talking about the differences in allocation schemes between
AmigaDos and DOS, i have to ask.. Is this a trick question ?


  L8r Frank (fadam{at}ozemail.com.au).
  
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.21

---