[Not happy with this Google Groups Beta, can't see how to post into
relevant section, so apologies for flow-breaking reply.]

On the question of what's Right, if plan 1 and plan 2 both work then
they are both successful, both Right. If one plan then comes into
conflict with another, eventually one will predominate and seem Right
to most people for a while. If you have found a philosophy that can
define Right absolutely then point me to it, I'd like to understand it
better.

If we look at it from the standpoint of success (sorry to drone on
about this) then an important C4M win-win is the next generation, I
suppose.

I'll take your sensible advice on the offspring, thanks.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 4/5/05 5:01:14 AM ---