| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Is Pluto a planet? |
Hello David, ->> One of the things that changed is that objects have been discovered ->> beyond Neptune's orbit that are not classied as planets. And recently ->> at least two them have been found that may be larger than Pluto. > > When it was originally discovered, Pluto was thought to be > similar in mass to Neptune and Uranus. Inaccurate measurements > of alleged perturbations caused by Pluto's gravity led to this > conclusion. As I understand it, the discovery of Pluto was more luck than arithmetic. It just happened to be very near the predicted spot, but the calculations were way off. > The fact that it looked so small was a bit of a mystery. One > theory that was around when I was a kid was that Pluto's surface was > shiny, so it was like a big metal ball. All that could be seen with > telescopes was the tiny reflection of the sun in this surface. > The rest of the planet was invisible. Yes, I remember that theory. > This theory bit the dust when an occultation of a star by Pluto was > observed. The star's light was *not* blocked by the presumed > invisible part of Pluto. Pluto really was as small as it looked. At > about the same time, the error in the mass estimate was discovered. Yep. > But the classification of Pluto as a planet, which was partly > based on its apparent large mass, Well, Mercury is considered a planet and it isn't very much bigger than Pluto. Pluto is about the same size as the moon. Some argue that our moon is much to big too classify as a proper moon and that earth-moon system should be classified as a double planet. Plus that Pluto has a moon of its own, which is a pretty strong point for classifying it as a planet I'd say. > had become ingrained in astronomical culture. I guess nobody gave ir real thought at the time, it was just labelled a planet. Period. > *Maybe*, because of the other large Kuiper Belt Objects that > have recently been discovered, this may change. Personally, I > hope that it does. Why? Does it really matter? Cheers, Michiel ---* Origin: http://www.vlist.org (2:280/5555) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 280/5555 5003 379/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.