Hi Frank,

FA>>> Yeah,but those derived structures are driving me bananas.;-)
FA>> C'mon, you were supposed to laugh at this, there are no derived
FA>> structures.:-)

MS>> Oh.  Ha ha ha!  :) Is that better?  ;-)

FA> No, the magic is lost forever now.
FA> Not to mention i was wrong. ;-)

Oh well, never mind.

FA>> Classes can be derived from a base class.This means that you
FA>> can have a number of classes having access to the base class'
FA>> even though the

MS>> Pretty much the same as in E.

FA> Well hello, i screwed up again, only friends can access private
FA> members.  I may have to prac up on C++ a bit i think.

Fine, I don't give a stuff about C++.

FA>> see a lot of mov ah 30h
FA>>              int 21h 
FA>>              cmp ??..

MS>> If you say so... it looks nothing like Motorola assembler.

FA> I didn't say it'll compile, i don't know much assembly apart
FA> from sort of able to read some of it.

Fine, but why did you show me some foreign assembler code?

FA>> It still bugs me, there HAS TO BE a table within DOS somewhere !

MS>> Good luck finding it.  And thanks for giving me yet another
MS>> reason why I shouldn't learn about your DOS.  :)

FA> Oi ! It's more challenging working with it. :-)

More challenge than what?

FA> (DOS - D) /2 isn't bad either i hear :-)

So I've heard.

Michael Stapleton of Graphic Bits
@EOT:

--- Msged/AM 4.00