>  FA> Yeah,but those derived structures are driving me bananas.;-)

 > C'mon, you were supposed to laugh at this, there are no derived
 > structures.:-)
 > Although in C++ a struct is treated as a class methink.

You've got it backwards.

The concept of 'struct' was expanded to 'class' to implement the OO
paradigm. In fact, there is a syntactic difference between the two -
members of a struct are, by default, publicly visible.

In other words, a C++ class is a C struct on steroids. :-)

--- MaltEd/2 1.0.b6