| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Portability v efficiency |
> BTW, do you ever see MicroSoft following other people's > standards? Yes, they have to. Fortunately Microsoft != IETF. :-) > internet. Another time, they submitted an RFC for > extensions to the PPP standard; when this was knocked > back, they implemented them anyway. An RFC "knocked back"? RFC's aren't normally refused. Whether they become IETF standards is another issue (like the FSC/FTS difference). --- MaltEd/2 1.0.b6* Origin: Unique Computing Pty Limited (3:632/348) SEEN-BY: 50/99 620/243 623/630 632/103 107 348 360 633/371 634/388 396 SEEN-BY: 635/301 502 503 544 728 639/252 711/409 410 413 430 808 809 932 934 SEEN-BY: 712/515 713/317 714/906 800/1 @PATH: 632/348 635/503 50/99 711/808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.