Jane Kelley (On 07 Jul 97) was overheard expounding to Bob Moylan
 BM> Liar Liar pants on fire!!!
 JK> Is this one of your wittier moments or were you under the influence of
 JK> too much fire water over the weekend when you wrote this one?
 The weekend?? On my calendar July 3, 1997 was a Thursday.
 BM> You posted the following on the date as shown below.  Deny it and
 BM> prove once and for all time that you lie like a rug!
 JK> My estimate of your emotional age has slipped vastly since receiving
 JK> this post.
 I really don't give a hoot what your estimates of anything are, with
 your post you prove once and for all (not that many needed any
 convincing) that even when confronted with the evidence of your own
 ramblings you claim to have said something else.
 JK> This implies, to anyone who read the entire post
 Oh never fear, I did read the entire rambling thing that contained
 not an iota of factual information; merely the musing of a retired
 nurse who no longer understands what _she_ reads and takes it at face
 value (which value is most often zilch) and runs with it.
 JK> and understood what
 JK> is was saying, that 2-300 years is not enough time to obtain genetic
 JK> protection especially with the advent of welfare and other methods of
 JK> interference with natural selection.
 What drivel and not even neat sidestepping.
 JK> The Orientals, as I have said in previous posts, have had alcohol for
 JK> thousands of years which is why they have developed a partial immunity
 JK> to the worst effects.
 Bull Jane.  Have you ever spent any time in the Orient?  I doubt it.
 There are as many, if not more, alcoholics there as here.
 JK> I really think that your time would be much better spent in classes on
 JK> this subject than in these posts of yours, Bob.
 For at least the one thousandth time ... I have little interest in
 alcoholics or other substance abusers.  It really isn't necessary to
 attend any classes to plainly see that your posts are full of
 nonsense and partially remembered bits/pieces of long ago.
 Put up some verifiable information - if it pans out as you say it
 does you'd possibly be doing some folks a service.  Until then ..
 well if you don't want to read rebuttals from me either hit what ever
 key your editor requires to skip posts from me or add me to your twit
 filter.  But then I'd essentially be talking behind your back
 wouldn't I?  I don't think you could stand the thought of that.
... Accept me for what I am - completely unacceptable.
--- PPoint 2.03
---------------