On 12-17-97, LARRY GAULT declared to ROBERT PLETT:
LG>ZL>     She argued that just as many uninformed men would vote for a 
_woman_
LG>ZL> President because she was beautiful, as would the other way around.
LG>RP> NEVER have I met the man I could believe would vote on such a basis.
LG>With the inclusion of the word "man", you are probably right, Robert.
  Interesting how you and John immediately picked up on that
qualifier.  
LG>However...
LG>There are many (way, way too many) *males* of voting age out there
LG>who would do just such a thing.
If there are, I haven't met them.  Met lots who vote really stupidly,
but wouldn't attribute that particular likelihood to them.
LG>Otherwise, there would be no explaining how the clinton/gore ticket
LG>managed to win.
LG>Not because of any physical attributes, mind you. But because enough ill
LG>informed, empty headed males made the decision to pull a lever based on
LG>nothing more than glitz and transparent lies.
But, that's a different thing, Larry.
LG> With this as a reasoning tool, an attractive woman would be too big a
LG>temptation for many of them to pass up.
While I'd not at all deny the existence of rampant idiocy, I still don't
buy that.
Bob     /\-/\   - proud Ilk   homebody@galstar.com
C.A.T. ( o o ) Chapter Ilks
       == ^ ==
Green Country - Oklahoma      http://www.galstar.com/~homebody/
 * SLMR 2.1a * Pray not for this people for their good. - Jer 14:11
---------------