In article , dimlan17
{at}yahoo.com says...
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 04:47:56 GMT, jayembee
>  wrote:
> 
> >"Mac Breck"  wrote:
> >
> >>> But if the usual rec.arts.sf.tv complainers aren't happy then
> >>> it's tough to imagine how Universal could possibly be.
> >> 
> >> And OTOH we have Bonnie Hammer cheerleaders like you.
> >
> >I don't think that David is a "cheerleader" for Hammer or anyone
> >else. He just sees things as they are.
> 
> Thanks. Sometimes I feel like I'm in the Twlight Zone. 
> 
> >> Universal is happy as long as the channel makes more and more
> >> money, and couldn't give a crap less about whether the channel
> >> has any decent sci-fi content.
> >
> >THAT'S EXACTLY RIGHT, AND IS THE WHOLE POINT.
> 
> Again, thanks. I don't wanna insult anybody. I'm pretty sure that,
> trolls aside, most people here are smart, reasonable adults. Yet
> something about usenet makes people ignore common sense about how
> things work and think that their personal tastes are somehow the
> absolute marker of quality and success. 

Maybe you are overlooking that this is crossposted to several scifi 
related groups and those people don't give a shit about what reality 
crap appeals to the unwashed masses when what they want to see is good 
scifi and thusly they are not going to like someone who gets rid of 
their programming in favor of something else. Even if that something 
else makes ton of money.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32