On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:10:17 -0500
"Mayayana"  wrote:

> "Ahem A Rivet's Shot"  wrote
>
> | CSS no (it is only Turing complete with a human being in the loop),
> | AutoIt never heard of it, AppleScript yes.
> |
> | Read about Turing Completeness, then answer the questions yourself.
> |
>
>   That's one way to look at it, but you completely
> missed the points I was making. By your definition
> an abacus is a programming language. So what?

 Nope, an abacus does nothing without a human being. Turing
completeness has been the effective definition of a programming language
for longer than I have been in the business.

--
Steve O'Hara-Smith                          |   Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN                                     | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins.                |    licences available see
You lose and Bill collects.                 |    http://www.sohara.org/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05