On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:25:26 -0500
"Mayayana" wrote:
> It's an interesting situation. More and more, things
> that people call "apps" are little more than webpages,
> while webpages are often bigger than a medium-sized
> software program -- bloated with 2+ MB of script. So
> it's not as clear cut as it used to be. And I can see
> how you might call js programming code. But then, why
> not HTML? It's code. It's interpreted to produce a
JavaScript is (ignoring resource limits) a Turing complete
language, HTML is not.
> useful result. CSS? Of course. AutoIt? Apple script?
CSS no (it is only Turing complete with a human being in the loop),
AutoIt never heard of it, AppleScript yes.
Read about Turing Completeness, then answer the questions yourself.
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays
C:\>WIN | A better way to focus the sun
The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see
You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|