On 01-05-98 William Elliot wrote to John Boone...
Hello William and thanks for writing,
[snip]
WE> JB> From "Fuzzy Logic" by Bart Kosko preface xvi:
WE> A mathematician?
It depends. However, in an attempt to answer your question,
I'll give you -his-, Bart Kosko's, words.
He says from the same book, preface xv, "I [Bart Kosko]
pursued gray truth in my graduate training in MATH [caps
added for emphasis] and electrical engineering and machine
intelligence. At first I worked with symbols on abstract math
theorums."
Finally, page 7:
I [BK] brooded about grayness too. It led me from
philosophy to mathematics to electrical engineering.
WE> JB> Fuzziness has a formal name in science: multivalence.
WE> JB> The opposite of fuzziness is BIVALENCE or TWO-valuedness.
WE> I haven't seem a workable finite multi-valued propositional calculus.
WE> have you?
Admitted, I haven't spent "much time" in this field so I can't
say yes. However, I do have a book, yet to be read, "Fuzzy Logic
for the Management of Uncertainty."
WE> Fuzziness uses real numbers does it not? What's the
Fuzziness does have "truth values" of zero -to- one.
WE> difference between fuzzy logic and fuzzy set theory? Fuzzy
Good question, one I can't "speak" to completely. But, one
I hope to explore one more, as my job is one dealing with
uncertainty.
WE> logic seemed like probability while fuzzy set theory didn't
WE> use the notion of probability, it used the notion of degree
WE> of inclusion, like light pink, pink, light red, red.
In an attempt, in Aristolian logic, "things" belong to
a set -xor- not, thus giving truth values of zero -xor- one.
In Fuzzy logic set theroy, a "thing" may belong to a set
(A) -AND- (not A) at the same time giving truth values
between and inclusive of zero and one.
I haven't had enough time to read and study sufficient
to -answer- your questions or -answer- -any- objections
to what is said (as in Fuzzy Logic is propositional calculus
in disguise).
Take care,
John
___
* OFFLINE 1.54
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------
* Origin: Strawberry Fields (1:116/5)
|